[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfPBP0TVt-==0wjcK6Oxg1kVN4mQf5Ji50RBy=SXf6yFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 23:20:28 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Steven Presser <steve@...ssers.name>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>,
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Steven Presser <steve@...ssers.name> wrote:
>> On 01/30/2018 02:05 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Steven Presser <steve@...ssers.name>
>>> wrote:
> Let's do this way. Create a bug on kernel bugzilla, attach output of
>
> % acpidump -o tables.dat # tables.dat file
> % grep -H 15 /sys/bus/acpi/devices/*/status
> % dmidecode
>
> and share the number here. I will take it.
Here [1] is the branch with another approach. Can you test it and tell
if it fixes the issue?
[1]: https://bitbucket.org/andy-shev/linux/branch/topic/iio-acpi
It's based on linux-next + compiletest branch of IIO subsystem.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists