lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180130230350.tcrrr4gqyja3edwo@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:03:50 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        syzbot 
        <bot+5a73b85ba48546cea8ed105946d67a37b4495724@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        davem <davem@...emloft.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in
 sctp_stream_free

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 01:31:26PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:51:01PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> >
> > from the log:
> > [   89.451366] FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.^M
> > [   89.451366] name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0,
> > times 0^M
> > [   89.451374] CPU: 0 PID: 17287 Comm: syz-executor2 Not tainted
> > +4.15.0-rc3-next-20171214+ #67^M
> > [   89.451377] Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google
> > Compute Engine, BIOS
> > +Google 01/01/2011^M
> > [   89.451380] Call Trace:^M
> > [   89.451395]  dump_stack+0xe9/0x14b^M
> > [   89.451408]  should_fail+0x1e5/0x220^M
> > [   89.451419]  should_failslab+0x73/0x90^M
> > [   89.451428]  __kmalloc+0x63/0x730^M
> > [   89.451439]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x74/0x80^M
> > [   89.451446]  ? __kmalloc+0x4ac/0x730^M
> > [   89.451452]  ? sctp_stream_alloc_in+0x2f/0x100^M
> > [   89.451464]  sctp_stream_alloc_in+0x2f/0x100^M
> > [   89.451473]  sctp_stream_init+0xfa/0x140^M
> > [   89.451485]  sctp_process_init+0x676/0xc50^M
> >
> > this is what caused the panic later, because in the error path we free
> > out but don't zero outcnt. This patch should fix it. Can you please
> > try it? Thanks
> >
> > ----8<---
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/stream.c b/net/sctp/stream.c
> > index 06b644dd858c..50ab09029f00 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/stream.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/stream.c
> > @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ int sctp_stream_init(struct sctp_stream *stream, __u16 outcnt, __u16 incnt,
> >         sched->free(stream);
> >         kfree(stream->out);
> >         stream->out = NULL;
> > +       stream->outcnt = 0;
> >  out:
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> 
> In case it can't be verified due to no reproducer yet, I modified some
> code in sctp_stream_init() to confirm Marcelo's deduction:
> -       i = sctp_stream_alloc_in(stream, incnt, gfp);
> +       i = 1;
>         if (i) {
>                 ret = -ENOMEM;
>                 goto free;
> 
> And got the same call trace as the mail:
> 
> [  301.488065] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
> at 0000000000000008
> [  301.488618] IP: sctp_stream_free+0x2c/0x60 [sctp]
> [  301.488928] PGD 59a3b067 P4D 59a3b067 PUD 5994e067 PMD 0
> [  301.489372] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [...]
> [  301.497647] Call Trace:
> [  301.497812]  <IRQ>
> [  301.497955]  sctp_association_free+0xb8/0x210 [sctp]
> [  301.498306]  sctp_sf_do_5_1B_init+0x1c4/0x360 [sctp]
> [  301.498654]  sctp_do_sm+0x9a/0x2d0 [sctp]
> [  301.498921]  ? sctp_has_association+0x130/0x130 [sctp]
> [  301.499301]  ? kernel_text_address+0xba/0xe0
> [  301.499615]  ? check_usage_backwards+0x88/0x150
> [  301.499911]  ? __lock_acquire+0x280/0x1080
> [  301.500200]  ? sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc+0x95/0x140 [sctp]
> [  301.500593]  sctp_endpoint_bh_rcv+0x11e/0x220 [sctp]
> [  301.500923]  sctp_rcv+0x9f5/0xbe0 [sctp]
> 
> And Marcelo's patch could fix it.
> 
> Since the "free:" part only works for if (i), maybe the patch can also do:
>         if (i) {
>                 sched->free(stream);
>                 kfree(stream->out);
>                 stream->out = NULL;
>                 stream->outcnt = 0;
> 
>                 ret = -ENOMEM;
>                 goto out;
>         }
> 
> and remove the "free:" path.

This crash seems to have stopped occurring now.  I presume it was fixed by the
following commit, so let's tell syzbot to close the bug:

#syz fix: sctp: fix error path in sctp_stream_init

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ