[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180131035941.GW26209@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:59:41 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read
> Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
> PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
I think it was disabled together with frequency mode
(which we could support too, but it's a bit more work)
But yes PERIOD could probably be allowed.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists