[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180131072644.nbr6t5rhx7yb4dhj@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:26:44 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Benoît Thébaudeau
<benoit.thebaudeau.dev@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: Use consistent naming
for eSDHC
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 01:05:13AM +0100, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> This file had several naming inconsistencies for eSDHC:
> - the instances were named sometimes SDn, sometimes SDHCn, whereas they
> are named ESDHCn in the reference manual, e.g.:
> MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD
> MX25_PAD_D15__SDHC1_DAT7
> - the data ports were named sometimes DATAn, sometimes DATn like in the
> reference manual, e.g.:
> MX25_PAD_SD1_DATA0__SD1_DATA0
> MX25_PAD_D15__SDHC1_DAT7
> - in one case, the clock port was named DAT_CLK instead of CLK:
> MX25_PAD_CSI_D7__SDHC2_DAT_CLK
>
> This change:
> - introduces new definitions using the naming from the reference
> manual,
> - keeps definitions using the legacy naming in order not to break
> compatibility for out-of-tree users (they can be removed later),
> - updates the in-tree files that were using the legacy naming.
>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau.dev@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - New patch (suggested by Uwe).
That's why I like it:
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
:-)
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists