[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180131110727.rmmwyqzwozwhda6z@oak.lan>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:07:27 +0000
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Aishwarya Pant <aishpant@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] backlight: lp8788: document sysfs attributes
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 08:20:08PM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
> Add documentation for sysfs interfaces of lp8788 backlight driver by
> looking through the code and the git commit history.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aishwarya Pant <aishpant@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-backlight-lp8788 | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-backlight-lp8788
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-backlight-lp8788 b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-backlight-lp8788
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c0e565c8d63d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-backlight-lp8788
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +sysfs interface for Texas Instruments lp8788 mfd backlight driver
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +What: /sys/class/backlight/<backlight>/bl_ctl_mode
> +Date: Feb, 2013
> +KernelVersion: v3.10
> +Contact: Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>
> +Description:
> + (RO) Displays whether the brightness is controlled by the PWM
> + input("PWM based") or the I2C register("Register based").
I rather dislike drivers with this type of "bonus" sysfs controls. I'm
struggling to come up with any reason why the userspace would want to
read this control (and I think bl_ctl_mode gets the fewest hits after
searching with google hits of any search I've tried) . It looks to me
like this is debug information that should never have gone into sysfs
at all.
So I think this is either something that should go directly into
ABI/obsolete (with a fairly short expiry time) or perhaps simply
remove the property entirely.
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists