linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: Register optional lis3lv02d i2c device on Dell machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf=-RQvCtS684Q5+X=YKmZXgP_1kr0to8BGZX0jQAsuZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:27:51 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>,
        Steven Honeyman <stevenhoneyman@...il.com>,
        Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
        Jochen Eisinger <jochen@...guin-breeder.org>,
        Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Mario Limonciello <Mario_Limonciello@...l.com>,
        Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: Register optional lis3lv02d i2c device on
 Dell machines

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 28 January 2018 17:00:35 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:

>> > ACPI device name is SMO8800, SMO8810, ... Will that acpi_dev_present
>> > function match only prefix and not exact string?
>>
>> OK, fair enough.
>>
>> Do we have more users of such pattern?
>
> I have not seen this ACPI pattern yet, so probably not.

I see. So, my  one concern is the implicit names of the devices. I
would like rather to see

... acpi_device_id ... []= {
 {"SMO8800"},
 {"SMO8810"},
...
{}
};

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko