[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180131144753.GB19945@bart.dudau.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:47:53 +0000
From: Liviu Dudau <liviu@...au.co.uk>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Yong <yong.deng@...ewell.com>, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
kbuild-all@...org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@...com>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Ramesh Shanmugasundaram <ramesh.shanmugasundaram@...renesas.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Rick Chang <rick.chang@...iatek.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, megous@...ous.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] media: V3s: Add support for
Allwinner CSI.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 08:42:12AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
Hi Maxime,
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:08:08AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:00:41AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > Hi Maxime,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:46:58 +0800
> > > Yong <yong.deng@...ewell.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Maxime,
> > > >
> > > > Do you have any experience in solving this problem?
> > > > It seems the PHYS_OFFSET maybe undeclared when the ARCH is not arm.
> > >
> > > Got it.
> > > Should I add 'depends on ARM' in Kconfig?
> >
> > No, I don't think you should do that, you should fix the code.
> >
> > The dma_addr_t addr that you've got is ideally coming from dma_alloc_coherent(),
> > in which case the addr is already "suitable" for use by the device (because the
> > bus where the device is attached to does all the address translations).
>
> Like we're discussing in that other part of the thread with Thierry
> and Arnd, things are slightly more complicated than that :)
Yeah, sorry, my threading of the discussion was broken and I've seen the rest of the
thread after I have replied. My bad!
>
> In our case, the bus where the device is attached will not do the
> address translations, and shouldn't.
In my view, the bus is already doing address translation at physical level, AFAIU it
remaps the memory to zero. What you (we?) need is a simple bus driver that registers
the correct virt_to_bus()/bus_to_virt() hooks for the device that do this translation
at the DMA API level as well.
>
> > If you apply PHYS_OFFSET forcefully to it you might get unexpected
> > results.
>
> Out of curiosity, what would be these unexpected results?
If in the future (or a parallel world setup) the device is sitting behind an IOMMU, the
addr value might well be smaller than PHYS_OFFSET and you will under-wrap, possibly
starting to hit kernel physical addresses (or anything sitting at the top of the physical
memory).
>From my time playing with IOMMUs and PCI domains, I've learned to treat the dma_addr_t as
a cookie value and never try to do arithmetics with it.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> Thanks!
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists