lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:41:28 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:33AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/31/2018 8:15 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:59:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
> > > > > PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
> > > > 
> > > > I think it was disabled together with frequency mode
> > > > (which we could support too, but it's a bit more work)
> > > > 
> > > > But yes PERIOD could probably be allowed.
> > > 
> > > looks like it's just a matter of adding PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD
> > > into PEBS_FREERUNNING_FLAGS, we already populate period
> > > in setup_pebs_sample_data
> > > 
> > > jirka
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> > > index 8e4ea143ed96..78f91ec1056e 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> > > @@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ struct amd_nb {
> > >   	PERF_SAMPLE_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_CPU | PERF_SAMPLE_STREAM_ID | \
> > >   	PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC | PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER | \
> > >   	PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION | PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR | \
> > > -	PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR | PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER)
> > > +	PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR | PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER | \
> > > +	PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD)
> > 
> > seems to work, getting large PEBS event for following command line:
> > 
> >    perf record -e cycles:P -c 100 --no-timestamp -C 0 --period
> > 
> > 
> 
> Yes, I tried the patch. The large PEBS can be enabled with the PERIOD flag.
> Everything looks good.
> 
> Jirka, could you please post the patch as well?

yes, will post that one as well

jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ