[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1814af5c-170d-39c0-58fd-02eb7216e008@landley.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:32:58 -0600
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
initramfs <initramfs@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Taras Kondratiuk <takondra@...co.com>,
Victor Kamensky <kamensky@...co.com>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rootfs: force mounting rootfs as tmpfs
On 01/30/2018 03:46 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Commit 16203a7a9422 ("initmpfs: make rootfs use tmpfs when CONFIG_TMPFS
> enabled") introduced using tmpfs as the rootfs filesystem. The use of
> tmpfs is limited to systems that do not specify "root=" on the boot
> command line.
>
> Without the check "!saved_root_name[0]", rootfs uses tmpfs. As there
> must be a valid reason for this check, this patch introduces a new boot
> command line option named "noramfs" to force rootfs to use tmpfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
How about just:
diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
index 7cf4f6d..af66ede 100644
--- a/init/do_mounts.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts.c
@@ -632,8 +632,8 @@ int __init init_rootfs(void)
if (err)
return err;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TMPFS) && !saved_root_name[0] &&
- (!root_fs_names || strstr(root_fs_names, "tmpfs"))) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TMPFS) && (!saved_root_name[0] ||
+ !strcmp(saved_root_name, "tmpfs"))) {
err = shmem_init();
is_tmpfs = true;
} else {
(Obviously-signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>)
I.E. if you somehow just can't stop yourself from specifying root= when
using rootfs, have "root=tmpfs" do what you want.
(The old "I configured in tmpfs and am using rootfs but I want that rootfs
to be ramfs, not tmpfs" code doesn't seem to be a real-world concern, does
it?)
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 ++
> init/do_mounts.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I suppose I should do a documentation update too. Lemme send a proper one
after work...
Rob
P.S. While I'm at it, I've meant to wire up rootflags= so you can specify
a memory limit other than 50% forever, I should do that too. And resend
my "make DEVTMPFS_MOUNT apply to initramfs" patch (with the debian bug
workaround)...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists