lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <b4bd6cda-a3b7-96dd-b634-d9b3670c1ecf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:55:05 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm/migrate: Add new migration reason MR_HUGETLB

On 01/30/2018 01:29 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 30-01-18 08:37:14, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> alloc_contig_range() initiates compaction and eventual migration for
>> the purpose of either CMA or HugeTLB allocation. At present, reason
>> code remains the same MR_CMA for either of those cases. Lets add a
>> new reason code which will differentiate the purpose of migration
>> as HugeTLB allocation instead.
> Why do we need it?

The same reason why we have MR_CMA (maybe some other ones as well) at
present, for reporting purpose through traces at the least. It just
seemed like same reason code is being used for two different purpose
of migration.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ