[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180201083812.11359-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:38:09 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] perf: PEBS/period freerunning fixes
hi,
Stephan reported that we don't support period for
enabling large PEBS data, which there's no reason
for. Sending fix for that plus related perf tool
period fixes Stephan reported.
thanks,
jirka
---
Jiri Olsa (3):
perf tools: Fix period/freq terms setup
perf record: Fix period option handling
x86/events/intel/ds: Add PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD into PEBS_FREERUNNING_FLAGS
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 3 ++-
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 3 ++-
tools/perf/perf.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 13 ++++++++++---
4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists