[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fff33c5-68c3-4070-ddbd-4b8f91da8f4d@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:20:42 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/41] clk: davinci: Add platform information for TI
DM355 PSC
On Saturday 20 January 2018 10:43 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> + LPSC(26, 0, gpio, pll1_sysclk2, gpio_clkdev, 0),
> + LPSC(27, 0, timer0, pll1_auxclk, timer0_clkdev, 0),
> + LPSC(28, 0, timer1, pll1_auxclk, NULL, 0),
> + /* REVISIT: why can't this be disabled? */
> + LPSC(29, 0, timer2, pll1_auxclk, timer2_clkdev,
> + LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
> + LPSC(31, 0, arm, pll1_sysclk1, NULL,
> + LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
IMO, in this case the line break makes it more difficult to read so that
checkpatch warning should be ignored.
Thanks
Sekhar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists