[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1067971124.17656949.1517490280812.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:04:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Marta Rybczynska <mrybczyn@...ray.eu>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: matanb@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com, saeedm@...lanox.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sean hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
hal rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Backport Mellanox mlx5 patches to stable 4.9.y
----- Mail original -----
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:12:51AM +0100, Marta Rybczynska wrote:
>> Hello Mellanox maintainers,
>> I'd like to ask you to OK backporting two patches in mlx5 driver to 4.9 stable
>> tree (they're in master for some time already).
>>
>> We have multiple deployment in 4.9 that are running into the bug fixed by those
>> patches. We're deploying patched kernels and the issue disappears.
>>
>> The patches are:
>> 1410a90ae449061b7e1ae19d275148f36948801b net/mlx5: Define interface bits for
>> fencing UMR wqe
>> 6e8484c5cf07c7ee632587e98c1a12d319dacb7c RDMA/mlx5: set UMR wqe fence according
>> to HCA cap
>
> Looks good, now queued up, thanks.
>
> greg k-h
Thanks Greg!
Marta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists