lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1517498160.5907.6.camel@tuxera.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:16:00 +0200
From:   Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas@...era.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
CC:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: sunxi: Switch MMC nodes away from
 cd-inverted property

Hi Maxime,

On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 16:03 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:57:37PM +0200, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
> > Using the cd-inverted property is not useful when GPIOs are used as
> > card
> > detects since the polarity can be specified with the usual
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_(HIGH|LOW) GPIO flags. It has also caused confusion for
> > U-Boot developers, so migrate all sunxi boards away from cd-
> > inverted.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas@...era.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>

I was assuming these patches will go in through the sunxi tree but I
don't see them applied anywhere, have these patches fallen through the
cracks perhaps?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ