[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1kW=c0p6wnNMu_85z4Rq1aRA02+mqRYkhnGTsuXsVjmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:29:53 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] compiler-gcc.h: __nostackprotector needs gcc-4.4 and up
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>> Gcc versions before 4.4 do not recognize the __optimize__ compiler
>>> attribute:
>
> And we might want to remove the dummy in include/linux/compiler_types.h:
>
> #ifndef __nostackprotector
> # define __nostackprotector
> #endif
>
> BTW, how does this work with non-gcc compilers?
clang should in theory accept the same flags, and it pretends to be an older
version of gcc.
I don't think anyone cares about ICC or any other compiler.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists