linux-kernel - Re: asm-generic: Disallow no-op mb() for SMP systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180201155007.GB2249@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:50:07 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: asm-generic: Disallow no-op mb() for SMP systems

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 03:39:51PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I could've gotten my brain in a twist or course, which isn't _that_
> > unusual. I never seem to be able to quite remember the holes you have
> > with ll/sc on arm64 :-)
> 
> Is smp_mb__before_atomic supposed to provide ordering guarantees if it's
> used before a failed cmpxchg? If so, I think it's needed here because the
> l.swa might not even execute. Or did I just invent another problem?

I think it should do so indeed (and afaik all our current archs are good
that way).