[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180201170024.GA30307@araj-mobl1.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:00:25 -0800
From: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] KVM: x86: Add IBPB support
Hi Karim
Thanks for cracking at it through all the iterations.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 08:37:44PM +0100, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
>
> The Indirect Branch Predictor Barrier (IBPB) is an indirect branch
> control mechanism. It keeps earlier branches from influencing
> later ones.
It might be better to split this patch into two parts.
- Just the place where we do IBPB barrier for VMX/SVM
- The msr get/set handling to comprehend guest, nested support etc.
The first part should be trivial so it can possibly make it into
tip/x86/pti branch sooner, while we rework the feedback to
address this completely.
Cheers,
Ashok
Powered by blists - more mailing lists