[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1517510213.6675.12.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 13:36:53 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dongsu Park <dongsu@...volk.io>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/2] ima,fuse: introduce new fs flag
FS_IMA_NO_CACHE
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 19:06 +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> This patchset v4 introduces a new fs flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE and uses it in
> FUSE. This forces files to be re-measured, re-appraised and re-audited
> on file systems with the feature flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE. In that way,
> cached integrity results won't be used.
Thanks!
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists