linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] of: cache phandle nodes to decrease cost of of_find_node_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fd9f5f63-b08e-602e-1510-85a65889f550@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Feb 2018 11:10:35 -0800
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:     Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: cache phandle nodes to decrease cost of
 of_find_node_by_phandle()

On 02/01/18 02:31, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> 
>>> Anyways, will fix this locally and share test results.
>>
>> Thanks, I look forward to the results.
>>
> 
> Set up for this time was slightly different. So, taken all the numbers again.
> 
> Boot to shell time (in ms): Experiment 2
> [1] Base            : 14.843805 14.784842 14.842338
> [2] 64 sized fixed cache    : 14.189292 14.200003 14.266711
> [3] Dynamic freeable cache    : 14.112412 14.064772 14.036052
> 
> So, [3] (this patch) looks to be improving 750ms (on avg from base build).
> 

Is this with the many debug options enabled?  If so, can you repeat with
a normal configuration?

Thanks,

Frank