[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180201065742.efww6os2qiwi2vjj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 07:57:42 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com,
j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr, boqun.feng@...il.com,
will.deacon@....com, peterz@...radead.org, npiggin@...il.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, elena.reshetova@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com,
akiyks@...il.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL tools] Linux kernel memory model
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I believe these additional improvements (to the extent you agree with doing them!)
> > could/should be done as add-on commits on top of this existing commit.
>
> Sounds good!
>
> Would you prefer a pull request or a patch series for these?
Patch series would be nice, for review and later application to the locking tree.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists