lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri,  2 Feb 2018 17:57:27 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 066/156] nvme-rdma: dont complete requests before a send work request has completed

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>


[ Upstream commit 4af7f7ff92a42b6c713293c99e7982bcfcf51a70 ]

In order to guarantee that the HCA will never get an access violation
(either from invalidated rkey or from iommu) when retrying a send
operation we must complete a request only when both send completion and
the nvme cqe has arrived. We need to set the send/recv completions flags
atomically because we might have more than a single context accessing the
request concurrently (one is cq irq-poll context and the other is
user-polling used in IOCB_HIPRI).

Only then we are safe to invalidate the rkey (if needed), unmap the host
buffers, and complete the IO.

Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ struct nvme_rdma_request {
 	struct nvme_request	req;
 	struct ib_mr		*mr;
 	struct nvme_rdma_qe	sqe;
+	union nvme_result	result;
+	__le16			status;
+	refcount_t		ref;
 	struct ib_sge		sge[1 + NVME_RDMA_MAX_INLINE_SEGMENTS];
 	u32			num_sge;
 	int			nents;
@@ -1177,6 +1180,7 @@ static int nvme_rdma_map_data(struct nvm
 	req->num_sge = 1;
 	req->inline_data = false;
 	req->mr->need_inval = false;
+	refcount_set(&req->ref, 2); /* send and recv completions */
 
 	c->common.flags |= NVME_CMD_SGL_METABUF;
 
@@ -1213,8 +1217,19 @@ static int nvme_rdma_map_data(struct nvm
 
 static void nvme_rdma_send_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
 {
-	if (unlikely(wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS))
+	struct nvme_rdma_qe *qe =
+		container_of(wc->wr_cqe, struct nvme_rdma_qe, cqe);
+	struct nvme_rdma_request *req =
+		container_of(qe, struct nvme_rdma_request, sqe);
+	struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(req);
+
+	if (unlikely(wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS)) {
 		nvme_rdma_wr_error(cq, wc, "SEND");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref))
+		nvme_end_request(rq, req->status, req->result);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1359,14 +1374,19 @@ static int nvme_rdma_process_nvme_rsp(st
 	}
 	req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
 
-	if (rq->tag == tag)
-		ret = 1;
+	req->status = cqe->status;
+	req->result = cqe->result;
 
 	if ((wc->wc_flags & IB_WC_WITH_INVALIDATE) &&
 	    wc->ex.invalidate_rkey == req->mr->rkey)
 		req->mr->need_inval = false;
 
-	nvme_end_request(rq, cqe->status, cqe->result);
+	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref)) {
+		if (rq->tag == tag)
+			ret = 1;
+		nvme_end_request(rq, req->status, req->result);
+	}
+
 	return ret;
 }
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ