linux-kernel - Re: Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Checking consistency for SmPL rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c7a59e25-a77f-a0ba-8635-5910dbba5d81@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Sat, 3 Feb 2018 08:22:54 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Checking consistency for SmPL rules

>> * Do we agree that a proper size determination is essential for every
>>   condition in the discussed SmPL rules together with forwarding
>>   this information?
> 
> No.  I don't mind a few false positives.

Do you care to split SmPL rules by their confidence category in such an use case?

Regards,
Markus