[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e8a86e6-5948-1e91-d937-893eb62ceef1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 19:09:55 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, jbenc@...hat.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1 v1] rtnetlink: require unique netns identifier
On 2/3/18 12:17 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:29:04 +0100
> Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com> wrote:
>
>> +static int rtnl_ensure_unique_netns_attr(const struct sock *sk,
>> + struct nlattr *tb[],
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>> + struct net *net = NULL, *unique_net = NULL;
>> +
>> + /* Requests without network namespace ids have been able to specify
>> + * multiple properties referring to different network namespaces so
>> + * don't regress them.
>> + */
>> + if (!tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID])
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (!tb[IFLA_NET_NS_PID] && !tb[IFLA_NET_NS_FD])
>> + return 0;
>
> Isn't this an error?
>
>> +
>> + unique_net = get_net_ns_by_id(sock_net(sk), nla_get_s32(tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID]));
>> + if (!unique_net)
>> + return -1;
>
> Other paths are returning errno, so why -1 here?
>
extack needs to be filled in too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists