[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180204125012.562129292eaa1843184c4997@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 12:50:12 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-users@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] tracing: Add array type to function based events
On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 10:29:03 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 22:56:15 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > This idea looks good for kprobe events too.
> > I'll try to implement same one :)
>
> We should have the two re-use the same code.
>
> In other words, I would like as much code sharing as possible.
Finally it will be, but currently the code base is too far.
I would like to implement it on current code for avoiding
break anything, but refactoring afterwards.
I think current fetch function implementation may be too heavy
with retpoline. I would like to reimplement it with eBPF :)
Thank you,
>
> -- Steve
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists