[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1517800721-42092-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:18:41 +0800
From: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jiang.biao2@....com.cn,
zhong.weidong@....com.cn, wen.yang99@....com.cn
Subject: [PATCH] sched/rt: Make update_curr_rt() more accurate
rq->clock_task may be updated between the two calls of
rq_clock_task() in update_curr_rt(). Calling rq_clock_task() only
once makes it more accurate and efficient, taking update_curr() as
reference.
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@....com.cn>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 4056c19..d6d2a65 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -950,12 +950,13 @@ static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &curr->rt;
+ u64 now = rq_clock_task(rq);
u64 delta_exec;
if (curr->sched_class != &rt_sched_class)
return;
- delta_exec = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;
+ delta_exec = now - curr->se.exec_start;
if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec <= 0))
return;
@@ -968,7 +969,7 @@ static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq)
curr->se.sum_exec_runtime += delta_exec;
account_group_exec_runtime(curr, delta_exec);
- curr->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
+ curr->se.exec_start = now;
cgroup_account_cputime(curr, delta_exec);
sched_rt_avg_update(rq, delta_exec);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists