[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ea1af5e-213d-5881-652a-c3f2c535254a@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:48:33 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-kasan-dev@...gen.mpg.de>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/kasan: Don't vfree() nonexistent vm_area.
On 02/02/2018 08:20 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:22:55PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>>>> + vm = find_vm_area((void *)shadow_start);
>>>> + if (vm)
>>>> + vfree((void *)shadow_start);
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> This looks like a complicated way to spell 'is_vmalloc_addr' ...
>>>
>>
>> It's not. shadow_start is never vmalloc address.
>
> I'm confused. How can you call vfree() on something that isn't a vmalloc
> address?
>
​vfree() is able to free any address returned by __vmalloc_node_range().
And __vmalloc_node_range() gives you any address you ask.
It doesn't have to be an address in [VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END] range.
That's also how the module_alloc()/module_memfree() works on architectures that
have designated area for modules.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists