[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180205092305.GF28462@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:53:05 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Bo Yan <byan@...dia.com>, sgurrappadi@...dia.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: skip cpufreq resume if it's not suspended
On 05-02-18, 10:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 10:57:55 PM CET Bo Yan wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index 41d148af7748..95b1c4afe14e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -1680,6 +1680,10 @@ void cpufreq_resume(void)
> > if (!cpufreq_driver)
> > return;
> >
> > + if (unlikely(!cpufreq_suspended)) {
> > + pr_warn("%s: resume after failing suspend\n", __func__);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > cpufreq_suspended = false;
> >
> > if (!has_target() && !cpufreq_driver->resume)
>
> I've just edited this patch somewhat (mostly by dropping the pr_warn())
> and queued it up.
You can add my Ack as well.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists