lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f57cae4e-560a-0ea4-16dd-bdf8696d4f7b@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:12:35 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 17/41] dt-bindings: clock: Add bindings for DA8XX
 CFGCHIP clocks

On Friday 02 February 2018 11:20 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 02/02/2018 12:20 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Saturday 20 January 2018 10:43 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>>> +EMIFA clock source (ASYNC1)
>>> +---------------------------
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: shall be "ti,da850-async1-clksrc".
>>> +- #clock-cells: from common clock binding; shall be set to 0.
>>> +- clocks: phandles to the parent clocks corresponding to clock-names
>>> +- clock-names: shall be "pll0_sysclk3", "div4.5"
>>
>> Is this clock really referred to as aysnc1 in documentation? I don't get
>> hits for async1 in OMAP-L138 TRM.
>>
> 
> It looks like it is only called ASYNC1 in the datasheet, not the TRM.
> 
> Table 6-5. Maximum Internal Clock Frequencies at Each Voltage Operating
> Point

I see it now. Its fine to use async1 then.

Thanks,
Sekhar

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ