[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180205105543.1711274c@karo-electronics.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 10:55:43 +0100
From: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 BUGFIX] ARM: dts: imx6ull: fix the imx6ull-14x14-evk
configuration
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:56:22 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts currently includes the imx6ul.dtsi file for an
> > i.MX6ULL SoC which is plain wrong.
> >
> > Rename the current imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts to .dtsi and include it from
> > imx6ul-14x14-evk.dts and imx6ull-14x14-evk.dts, so that both can
> > include the appropriate SoC specific (imx6ul.dtsi/imx6ull.dtsi) file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
>
> Which base is the patch generated against? I cannot apply it to any
> branch in my tree.
>
The patch was generated against next-20180118 but also applies to
next-20180205.
Lothar Waßmann
Powered by blists - more mailing lists