[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a178f4b-75fe-0564-7b0e-596f52fca1dc@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:53:06 +0530
From: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: cache phandle nodes to decrease cost of
of_find_node_by_phandle()
>
> My question was trying to determine whether the numbers reported above
> are for a debug configuration or a production configuration.
My reported numbers are from debug configuration.
> not a production configuration, I was requesting the numbers for a
> production configuration.
I'm working on it. But please expect some delay in my response for this.
As I mentioned earlier, I need to work with few teams to get these numbers.
> show a significant boot time reduction from the patch then there is
> less justification for adding complexity to the existing code. I
> prefer to use simpler data structures and algorithms __if__ extra
> complexity does not provide any advantage. The balance between
> complexity and benefits is a core software engineering issue.
>
Ok
>
>> I don't have a set up for taking these numbers in perf mode. For
>> that, I need to ask some other team and round trip follow ups. In my
>> set up, I rely on serial console logging which gets disabled in perf
>> mode.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>
>> Chintan
>
Chintan
--
Qualcom India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists