linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 7/9] ACPI: Translate the I/O range of non-MMIO devices before scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af37de60-a016-f8e3-9e17-d4e7d345f3fb@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Feb 2018 12:17:20 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        "dann.frazier@...onical.com" <dann.frazier@...onical.com>,
        "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/9] ACPI: Translate the I/O range of non-MMIO devices
 before scanning

On 05/02/2018 12:10, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 11:01 +0000, John Garry wrote:
>> On 04/02/2018 07:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> +       /* translate the I/O resources */
>>>> +       for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>>>> +               if (resources[i].flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
>>>> +                       ret = acpi_translate_logicio_res(adev, host,
>>>> +                                                       &resources[i]);
>>>
>>> You don't need to break this line as far as I'm concerned.
>>
>> This is just to keep checkpatch happy. I could move the complete
>> function call to a single line. And also shortening some symbols will help.
>
> This could also use continue as well
>
> 	/* translate the I/O resources */
> 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> 		if (!(resources[i].flags & IORESOURCE_IO))
> 			continue;
> 		ret = acpi_translate_logicio_res(adev, host, &resources[i]);
> 		if (ret) {
> 			kfree(resources);
> 			dev_err(child, "Translate I/O range failed (%d)!\n",
> 				ret);
> 			return ret;
> 		}
> 	}

Sure, that reduces the indentation as well.

cheers

>
>
> .
>