linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180205163353.llyamby4o7ajsvt7@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:33:53 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
        Maged Michael <maged.michael@...il.com>,
        Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        David Sehr <sehr@...gle.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Ingo/Peter/Thomas,
>  can you comment on this? I'd like to get this moving one way or
> another, rather than just hold it back forever.
> 
> I _think_ all the concerns were resolved, no?

Yeah, I wanted to apply these bits later today with some minor edits - unless you 
are going to pull it directly.

Thanks,

	Ingo