[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180205170006.GA4838@magnolia>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 09:00:06 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Wang Long <wanglong19@...tuan.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: set to NULL after kmem_cache_destroy
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:39:17PM +0800, Wang Long wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wang Long <wanglong19@...tuan.com>
> ---
> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index 93016bb..38dc24c 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -2649,11 +2649,14 @@ static int __init jbd2_journal_init_handle_cache(void)
>
> static void jbd2_journal_destroy_handle_cache(void)
> {
> - if (jbd2_handle_cache)
> + if (jbd2_handle_cache) {
> kmem_cache_destroy(jbd2_handle_cache);
kmem_cache_destroy already handles null pointers, so you can remove the
conditional test entirely.
--D
> - if (jbd2_inode_cache)
> + jbd2_handle_cache = NULL;
> + }
> + if (jbd2_inode_cache) {
> kmem_cache_destroy(jbd2_inode_cache);
> -
> + jbd2_inode_cache = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists