linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1659703322.16254.1517856780591.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Feb 2018 18:53:00 +0000 (UTC)
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
        maged michael <maged.michael@...il.com>,
        Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        "Russell King, ARM Linux" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        David Sehr <sehr@...gle.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 4.16 00/11] membarrier updates for 4.16

----- On Feb 5, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Linus Torvalds torvalds@...ux-foundation.org wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I wanted to apply these bits later today with some minor edits - unless
>> you
>> are going to pull it directly.
> 
> I have not pulled yet, I wanted to check. But I do want to get it merged.
> 
> It gets easier for me if I can just pull.
> 
> Mathieu, do you have a git tree? I don't think I've pulled from you,
> so in that sense it's more convenient for me if it goes through Ingo.
> 
> But if you have a git tree already set up, just holler.

I indeed have a git tree setup. The URL is in the pull request I sent you this
morning.

But I favor letting it go through Ingo's scheduler tree and benefit from the extra
bit of automated testing this could add.

Thanks to you both,

Mathieu

> 
>              Linus

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com