linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/7] cpuset: Rebuild root domain deadline accounting information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLsYkwq9c+xS-TJrntWzKyCWWwQHfPRTv93SSbacmSjPPHhPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:59:30 -0700
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>,
        "luca.abeni" <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/7] cpuset: Rebuild root domain deadline accounting information

On 2 February 2018 at 05:52, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On 01/02/18 09:51, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> When the topology of root domains is modified by CPUset or CPUhotplug
>> operations information about the current deadline bandwidth held in the
>> root domain is lost.
>>
>> This patch address the issue by recalculating the lost deadline
>> bandwidth information by circling through the deadline tasks held in
>> CPUsets and adding their current load to the root domain they are
>> associated with.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> +static void update_tasks_root_domain(struct cpuset *cs)
>> +{
>> +     struct css_task_iter it;
>> +     struct task_struct *task;
>> +
>> +     css_task_iter_start(&cs->css, 0, &it);
>> +
>> +     while ((task = css_task_iter_next(&it)))
>> +             dl_add_task_root_domain(task);
>> +
>> +     css_task_iter_end(&it);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Called with cpuset_mutex held (rebuild_sched_domains())
>> + * Called with hotplug lock held (rebuild_sched_domains_locked())
>> + * Called with sched_domains_mutex held (partition_and_rebuild_domains())
>> + */
>> +static void rebuild_root_domains(void)
>> +{
>> +     struct cpuset *cs = NULL;
>> +     struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
>> +
>> +     rcu_read_lock();
>> +
>> +     /*
>> +      * Clear default root domain DL accounting, it will be computed again
>> +      * if a task belongs to it.
>> +      */
>> +     dl_clear_root_domain(&def_root_domain);
>
> Can't a __sched_setscheduler sneak in at this point, set a task to
> DEADLINE, add its bandwidth to the rd...

Let me think about that one for a bit.

Thanks for the review,
Mathieu

>
>> +
>> +     cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cs, pos_css, &top_cpuset) {
>> +
>> +             if (cpumask_empty(cs->effective_cpus)) {
>> +                     pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
>> +                     continue;
>> +             }
>> +
>> +             css_get(&cs->css);
>> +
>> +             rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> +             update_tasks_root_domain(cs);
>
> ... and this adds it again?
>
>> +
>> +             rcu_read_lock();
>> +             css_put(&cs->css);
>> +     }
>> +     rcu_read_unlock();
>> +}
>
> Best,
>
> - Juri