[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2R02bNZF-BYW6mbC9jCT+zx-HUtw1y1HS5EifOuOting@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:48:17 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>
Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Greentime <greentime@...estech.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <vincentc@...estech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/36] nds32: VDSO support
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:41 AM, Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com> wrote:
> 2018-01-18 18:28 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com> wrote:
>>> From: Greentime Hu <greentime@...estech.com>
>>>
>>> This patch adds VDSO support. The VDSO code is currently used for
>>> sys_rt_sigreturn() and optimised gettimeofday() (using the SoC timer counter).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincentc@...estech.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime@...estech.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Dear Arnd Bergmann:
>
> We find a small bug here which make LTP 20170929 clock_getres01
> fail. The bug is in __vdso_clock_getres() function. When argument res
> is NULL, -EFAULT error code is returned now. But, the returned
> value is 0 for SyS_clock_getres under the same conditions.
> Therefore, testcase thinks it is a bug.
>
> I will modify the code as below and add it in the next version patch
> if you think it is OK.
>
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static notrace int clock_getres_fallback( ...
> {
> if (res == NULL)
> - return -EFAULT;
> + return 0;
>
Ok. I don't know why that is the expected behavior (clock_getres
with a NULL argument makes little sense), but I can see that it
matches the regular syscall implementation.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists