[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180206090455.GA15925@isilmar-4.linta.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:04:55 +0100
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/entry: Clear registers for 64bit
exceptions/interrupts
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:18:11PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> @@ -1178,6 +1180,7 @@ ENTRY(paranoid_entry)
> cld
> SAVE_C_REGS 8
> SAVE_EXTRA_REGS 8
> + CLEAR_REGS_NOSPEC
> ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER 8
> movl $1, %ebx
> movl $MSR_GS_BASE, %ecx
> @@ -1185,7 +1188,6 @@ ENTRY(paranoid_entry)
> testl %edx, %edx
> js 1f /* negative -> in kernel */
> SWAPGS
> - xorl %ebx, %ebx
Here, %ebx will be filled with $1 (see code snipped above) *after* the
call to CLEAR_REGS_NOSPEC. That's what this line has been clearing in the
past. So I'm not sure whether this line should be removed.
Thanks,
Dominik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists