[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1517911838.31953.208.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:10:38 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] tools headers: Synchoronize x86 features UAPI
headers
On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 16:56 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> None will entail changes in the tools/perf/, synchronizing to elliminate
> these perf build warnings:
>
> Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h' differs from latest version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h'
> Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h' differs from latest version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h'
> Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h' differs from latest version at 'arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h'
Ick. Have we considered just using a symlink? Why have copies of the
same header file in different places in the tree, and tooling to
complain i̶f̶when they get out of sync?
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists