lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+Cx_KVftOfeGWjqn_1P=j8R-NsNcH7w+pA9gCouM_4FDRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:57:37 +0800
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc:     kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix CR4 after VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME failure

2018-02-06 2:24 GMT+08:00 Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>:
> [Resending as plain text]
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:21 AM Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> This is incorrect. In the event of an early VM-entry failure (e.g. a
>> VM-entry failure for "VM entry with invalid control field(s)"), no host
>> state should be loaded from the VMCS12. Of course, no guest state should
>> have been loaded from the VMCS12 either, but that's a problem we have with
>> deferring some VMCS12 control field checks to the hardware.
>
>> CR4 should be unchanged from the time of the VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME. There is

This is effective one, what I restore in this patch is
achitectural/guest visible.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

>> no guarantee that vmcs12->host_cr4 holds the correct value.
>
>
>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:05 AM Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> wrote:
>
>>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
>
>>> In L0, Haswell client host:
>
>>>   nested_vmx_exit_reflected failed vm entry 7
>>>   WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 6797 at kvm/arch/x86/kvm//vmx.c:6206
>>> handle_desc+0x2d/0x40 [kvm_intel]
>>>   CPU: 6 PID: 6797 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Tainted: G        W  OE
>>> 4.15.0+ #4
>>>   RIP: 0010:handle_desc+0x2d/0x40 [kvm_intel]
>>>   Call Trace:
>>>    vmx_handle_exit+0xbd/0xe20 [kvm_intel]
>>>    ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xcde/0x1c00 [kvm]
>>>    kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xd5a/0x1c00 [kvm]
>>>    kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3e9/0x720 [kvm]
>>>    ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3e9/0x720 [kvm]
>>>    ? __fget+0xfc/0x210
>>>    ? __fget+0xfc/0x210
>>>    do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x6a0
>>>    ? __fget+0x11d/0x210
>>>    SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
>>>    entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x25/0x9c
>
>>> This can be reproduced by running kvm-unit-tests/run_tests.sh
>>> vmx_controls in
>>> L1. UMIP CPUID bit is exposed to the L1 UMIP aware guest since it is
>>> emulated
>>> by enabling descriptor-table exits on L0. There is a vmentry fail when
>>> L0 tries to run L2 directly, the L1 guest architectural CR4 is not
>>> restored
>>> after this failure since commit 4f350c6dbcb (kvm: nVMX: Handle deferred
>>> early
>>> VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME failure properly). The L2 is kvm-unit-tests which will
>>> not
>>> write CR4 w/ X86_CR4_UMIP bit. After another L1 access descriptor vmexit,
>>> we
>>> check L2's architectural CR4 instead of L1's architectural CR4. This
>>> patch
>>> fixes it by restoring L1's architectural CR4 after L0's VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME
>>> failure.
>
>>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> index 23789c9..9fc0492 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> @@ -11633,6 +11633,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu, u32 exit_reason,
>>>           */
>>>          nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD);
>
>>> +       vcpu->arch.cr4 = vmcs12->host_cr4;
>>>          load_vmcs12_mmu_host_state(vcpu, vmcs12);
>
>>>          /*
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ