[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180206123735.GA6151@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 04:37:35 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>
Cc: jglisse@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
labbott@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org, cl@...ux.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] struct page: add field for vm_struct
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:14:43PM +0200, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> @@ -1744,6 +1748,7 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
> const void *caller)
> {
> struct vm_struct *area;
> + unsigned int page_counter;
> void *addr;
> unsigned long real_size = size;
>
> @@ -1769,6 +1774,9 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
>
> kmemleak_vmalloc(area, size, gfp_mask);
>
> + for (page_counter = 0; page_counter < area->nr_pages; page_counter++)
> + area->pages[page_counter]->area = area;
> +
> return addr;
>
LOCAL variable names should be short, and to the point. If you have
some random integer loop counter, it should probably be called ``i``.
Calling it ``loop_counter`` is non-productive, if there is no chance of it
being mis-understood. Similarly, ``tmp`` can be just about any type of
variable that is used to hold a temporary value.
(Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists