[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1517924768.25841.32.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 14:46:08 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched
<bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>,
Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@...il.com>, ming.lei@...hat.com,
ivan@...ios.org, 169364@...denti.unimore.it,
Serena Ziviani <ziviani.serena@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook
On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 13:16 +0100, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Hi.
>
> 06.02.2018 12:57, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Not me. Box seems to be fairly sure that it is bfq. Twice again box
> > went belly up on me in fairly short order with bfq, but seemed fine
> > with deadline. I'm currently running deadline again, and box again
> > seems solid, thought I won't say _is_ solid until it's been happily
> > trundling along with deadline for a quite a bit longer.
>
> Sorry for the noise, but just to make it clear, are we talking about
> "deadline" or "mq-deadline" now?
mq-deadline.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists