[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7920f8f4-8f25-4633-7a17-bdda5351a9e9@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:53:16 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ian Ray <ian.ray@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Nandor Han <nandor.han@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: Add platform hardware setup
hooks.
Hi Sebastian,
On 06/02/18 14:26, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Allow platform specific code to be called when enabling or
> disabling the hardware.
Since arm_pmu_platdata wants to go away[1], does i.MX53 actually need
all this machinery, or would it suffice to set DBG_EN from platform code
at boot time and simply leave it that way?
Robin.
[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-February/557838.html
> Signed-off-by: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@...keon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>
> [rebased to v4.12]
> Signed-off-by: Nandor Han <nandor.han@...com>
> [Simplify and cleanup for upstreaming]
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index 7bc5eee96b31..9c282914ee67 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -452,8 +452,10 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> static void armpmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
> struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(pmu);
> + struct arm_pmu_platdata *platdata = armpmu_get_platdata(armpmu);
> struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events = this_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events);
> int enabled = bitmap_weight(hw_events->used_mask, armpmu->num_events);
> + int err;
>
> /* For task-bound events we may be called on other CPUs */
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &armpmu->supported_cpus))
> @@ -461,17 +463,27 @@ static void armpmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
>
> if (enabled)
> armpmu->start(armpmu);
> +
> + if (platdata && platdata->reserve_hardware) {
> + err = platdata->reserve_hardware(armpmu);
> + if (err)
> + dev_warn(&armpmu->plat_device->dev, "Could not reserve PMU hardware!\n");
> + }
> }
>
> static void armpmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
> struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(pmu);
> + struct arm_pmu_platdata *platdata = armpmu_get_platdata(armpmu);
>
> /* For task-bound events we may be called on other CPUs */
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &armpmu->supported_cpus))
> return;
>
> armpmu->stop(armpmu);
> +
> + if (platdata && platdata->release_hardware)
> + platdata->release_hardware(armpmu);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> index af0f44effd44..942ae9bfe971 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> #include <asm/cputype.h>
>
> +struct arm_pmu;
> +
> /*
> * struct arm_pmu_platdata - ARM PMU platform data
> *
> @@ -31,6 +33,8 @@
> struct arm_pmu_platdata {
> irqreturn_t (*handle_irq)(int irq, void *dev,
> irq_handler_t pmu_handler);
> + int (*reserve_hardware)(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu);
> + void (*release_hardware)(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu);
> unsigned long irq_flags;
> };
>
> @@ -112,6 +116,7 @@ struct arm_pmu {
> int (*map_event)(struct perf_event *event);
> int num_events;
> u64 max_period;
> + bool reserved_hardware;
> bool secure_access; /* 32-bit ARM only */
> #define ARMV8_PMUV3_MAX_COMMON_EVENTS 0x40
> DECLARE_BITMAP(pmceid_bitmap, ARMV8_PMUV3_MAX_COMMON_EVENTS);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists