[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1517938230.3677.1.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 17:30:30 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Always print RLIMIT_DATA warning
On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 20:27 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 04:45:05PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > The documentation for ignore_rlimit_data says that it will print a warning
> > at first misuse. Yet it doesn't seem to do that. Fix the code to print
> > the warning even when we allow the process to continue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
> > ---
> > We should probably also do what Linus suggested inĀ
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/16/585
> >
> Might be typo in docs I guess, Kostya?
I prefer the documented behaviour to the actual behaviour :)
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists