linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] apparent bogosity in unregister_ftrace_function_probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJwJo6aYu2qAHcrYD8mTn43+4Z5ikJ6qoM7SxPtG=NuVcYtauQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Feb 2018 02:44:03 +0000
From:   Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] apparent bogosity in unregister_ftrace_function_probe_func()

2018-02-06 2:40 GMT+00:00 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 11:26:14 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> No, that code looks good to me. :)
>>
>> BTW, did you also remove "search = buff;" line in
>> unregister_ftrace_function_probe_func() too?
>
> That's a separate bug, and should be a separate patch. Dmitry mentioned
> that he was preparing a patch to fix that.
>
> Dmitry did you have a patch and added selftests to check it? If not,
> I'll whip one up.

Yes, I've planned to do this..
As it's merge-window now I thought doing this a week later.
So, it's up to you - just let me know so we will not end doing the same fix :)

-- 
             Dmitry