[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfYg_k6Xc3XEW-sLGiU64SXs8jRnGh-Ee4-NUiEkXSGyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 20:43:08 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: avoid misleading "(null)" for %px
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:22 AM, Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc> wrote:
> The original patch is good IMO and I AFAICT in everyone else's.
The original patch misses test cases.
Without them is problematic to follow what's going on with printing.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists