[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180206215959.0f640736@alans-desktop>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 21:59:59 +0000
From: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: tedheadster <tedheadster@...il.com>
Cc: whiteheadm@....org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
jikos@...nel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>, eduval@...zon.com,
labbott@...hat.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86 : i486 reporting to be vulnerable to
Meltdown/Spectre_V1/Spectre_V2
> If that is correct (and I might be wrong), then I am up to date and I
> am still getting the following in /proc/cpuinfo on my Pentium 4M i686:
>
> bugs : cpu_meltdown spectre_v1 spectre_v2
>
> - Matthew
That's an interesting museum piece. It's a Northwood core so I believe
the reporting is correct.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists