[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1517956309.2312.172.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 09:31:49 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of_pci_irq: add a check to fallback to standard
device tree parsing
On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 13:42 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> Thanks for explanation.
>
> So I guess the better way to achieve my aim - one IRQ per slot that is
> connected to all INTx and get propagated through the bridges (and for
> those root ports own interrupts (PME ..)} is to add interrupt-map
> properties in both parent and root port nodes.
>
> Something like this: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9970923// ,right?
Yup.
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists