[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43b34b44-f613-79c6-1fe4-01c9dfe85e62@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 10:17:03 +0530
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add minimal dts/dtsi files for
sdm845 SoC and MTP
[]..
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SDM845";
>
> This should only be in the board level file.
thanks, will fix.
>
>> +
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> +
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> + chosen { };
>> +
>> + memory {
>> + device_type = "memory";
>> + /* We expect the bootloader to fill in the reg */
>
> The start address is variable? If not you should populate the base and
> have a unit-address.
sure, I'll check and update.
>
>> + reg = <0 0 0 0>;
>> + };
>> +
[]..
>> +
>> + soc: soc {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>> +
>> + intc: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #redistributor-regions = <1>;
>> + redistributor-stride = <0x0 0x20000>;
>> + reg = <0x17a00000 0x10000>, /* GICD */
>> + <0x17a60000 0x100000>; /* GICR * 8 */
>> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + gcc: clock-controller@...000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,gcc-sdm845";
>
> sdm845-gcc is the preferred order.
This is still proposed as part of the GCC patch for sdm845 [1]
(which looks like has neither you nor the DT list copied :/ )
Also looking at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt,
I see we seem to follow the gcc-<soc> convention for compatible all along :(
"qcom,gcc-apq8064"
"qcom,gcc-apq8084"
"qcom,gcc-ipq8064"
"qcom,gcc-ipq4019"
"qcom,gcc-ipq8074"
"qcom,gcc-msm8660"
"qcom,gcc-msm8916"
"qcom,gcc-msm8960"
"qcom,gcc-msm8974"
"qcom,gcc-msm8974pro"
"qcom,gcc-msm8974pro-ac"
"qcom,gcc-msm8994"
"qcom,gcc-msm8996"
"qcom,gcc-mdm9615"
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10193895/
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists