[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180207092919.19696-3-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:29:19 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] zram: drop max_zpage_size and use zs_huge_object()
This patch removes ZRAM's enforced "huge object" value and uses
zsmalloc huge-class watermark instead, which makes more sense.
TEST
- I used a 1G zram device, LZO compression back-endi, original
data set size was 444MB. Looking at zsmalloc classes stats the
test ended up to be pretty fair.
BASE ZRAM/ZSMALLOC
=====================
zram mm_stat
498978816 191482495 199831552 0 199831552 15634 0
zsmalloc classes
class size almost_full almost_empty obj_allocated obj_used pages_used pages_per_zspage freeable
...
151 2448 0 0 1240 1240 744 3 0
168 2720 0 0 4200 4200 2800 2 0
190 3072 0 0 10100 10100 7575 3 0
202 3264 0 0 380 380 304 4 0
254 4096 0 0 10620 10620 10620 1 0
Total 7 46 106982 106187 48787 0
PATCHED ZRAM/ZSMALLOC
=====================
zram mm_stat
498978816 182579184 194248704 0 194248704 15628 0
zsmalloc classes
class size almost_full almost_empty obj_allocated obj_used pages_used pages_per_zspage freeable
...
151 2448 0 0 1240 1240 744 3 0
168 2720 0 0 4200 4200 2800 2 0
190 3072 0 0 10100 10100 7575 3 0
202 3264 0 0 7180 7180 5744 4 0
254 4096 0 0 3820 3820 3820 1 0
Total 8 45 106959 106193 47424 0
As we can see, we reduced the number of objects stored in class-4096,
because a huge number of objects which we previously forcibly stored
in class-4096 now stored in non-huge class-3264. This results in lower
memory consumption:
- zsmalloc now uses 47424 physical pages, which is less than 48787
pages zsmalloc used before.
- objects that we store in class-3264 share zspages. That's why overall
the number of pages that both class-4096 and class-3264 consumed went
down from 10924 to 9564.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 6 +++---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 16 ----------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 0afa6c8c3857..3d2bc4b1423c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static int __zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
return ret;
}
- if (unlikely(comp_len > max_zpage_size)) {
+ if (unlikely(zs_huge_object(comp_len))) {
if (zram_wb_enabled(zram) && allow_wb) {
zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
ret = write_to_bdev(zram, bvec, index, bio, &element);
@@ -1022,10 +1022,10 @@ static int __zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
dst = zs_map_object(zram->mem_pool, handle, ZS_MM_WO);
src = zstrm->buffer;
- if (comp_len == PAGE_SIZE)
+ if (zs_huge_object(comp_len))
src = kmap_atomic(page);
memcpy(dst, src, comp_len);
- if (comp_len == PAGE_SIZE)
+ if (zs_huge_object(comp_len))
kunmap_atomic(src);
zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
index 31762db861e3..d71c8000a964 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
@@ -21,22 +21,6 @@
#include "zcomp.h"
-/*-- Configurable parameters */
-
-/*
- * Pages that compress to size greater than this are stored
- * uncompressed in memory.
- */
-static const size_t max_zpage_size = PAGE_SIZE / 4 * 3;
-
-/*
- * NOTE: max_zpage_size must be less than or equal to:
- * ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE. Otherwise, zs_malloc() would
- * always return failure.
- */
-
-/*-- End of configurable params */
-
#define SECTOR_SHIFT 9
#define SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT (PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT)
#define SECTORS_PER_PAGE (1 << SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT)
--
2.16.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists