[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb76fb4e-5e6c-92eb-d79a-96045f74e91b@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:41:04 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...s.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: mips-gic: Avoid spuriously handling masked
interrupts
On 05/02/18 16:45, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> Commit 7778c4b27cbe ("irqchip: mips-gic: Use pcpu_masks to avoid reading
> GIC_SH_MASK*") removed the read of the hardware mask register when
> handling shared interrupts, instead using the driver's shadow pcpu_masks
> entry as the effective mask. Unfortunately this did not take account of
> the write to pcpu_masks during gic_shared_irq_domain_map, which
> effectively unmasks the interrupt early. If an interrupt is asserted,
> gic_handle_shared_int decodes and processes the interrupt even though it
> has not yet been unmasked via gic_unmask_irq, which also sets the
> appropriate bit in pcpu_masks.
>
> On the MIPS Boston board, when a console command line of
> "console=ttyS0,115200n8r" is passed, the modem status IRQ is enabled in
> the UART, which is immediately raised to the GIC. The interrupt has been
> mapped, but no handler has yet been registered, nor is it expected to be
> unmasked. However, the write to pcpu_masks in gic_shared_irq_domain_map
> has effectively unmasked it, resulting in endless reports of:
>
> [ 5.058454] irq 13, desc: ffffffff80a7ad80, depth: 1, count: 0, unhandled: 0
> [ 5.062057] ->handle_irq(): ffffffff801b1838,
> [ 5.062175] handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x2c0
>
> Where IRQ 13 is the UART interrupt.
>
> To fix this, just remove the write to pcpu_masks in
> gic_shared_irq_domain_map. The existing write in gic_unmask_irq is the
> correct place for what is now the effective unmasking.
>
> Fixes: 7778c4b27cbe ("irqchip: mips-gic: Use pcpu_masks to avoid reading GIC_SH_MASK*")
> Signed-off-by: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...s.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> index b2cfc6d66d74..2c3684ba46e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> @@ -429,8 +429,6 @@ static int gic_shared_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
> spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
> write_gic_map_pin(intr, GIC_MAP_PIN_MAP_TO_PIN | shared_cpu_pin);
> write_gic_map_vp(intr, BIT(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu)));
> - gic_clear_pcpu_masks(intr);
> - set_bit(intr, per_cpu_ptr(pcpu_masks, cpu));
> irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(cpu));
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
>
>
Does this need to be Cc to stable (since it fixes something that was
merged in 4.14)?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists